Home   Our Attorneys   About Us   Location   The Drink Wheel 

State v. Michaud
State of Montana v. Gerrad Michaud, DA-06-0553, 2008 MT 88

This was a criminal case before the Missoula Justice Court that was appealed to District Court trial de novo and then appealed to the Supreme Court. There were four issues presented to the Supreme Court. The first issue was whether the District Court errored in limiting voir dire to fifteen minutes. The Supreme Court held that they did not abuse their discretion in this case.

The second issue was whether the District Court errored in allowing testimony from the police officer concerning the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test. The Supreme Court decided that since the District Court allowed the evidence without a foundation of expert testimony the Court did abuse its descrition and reversed the decision and remanded the case for retrail.

The third and forth issues were both related to the inference in §61-8-404(2) MCA. First the refusal of a breath test can infer that person is guilty of a DUI violates due process rights and second the Defendant is denied his right to counsel at critical stage. The Supreme Court affirmed the District Court's decision on both of these inferences. To read more on these issues the opinion can be read on the Montana Supreme Court website.


Latest Firm News

New Shareholder

2009 State Bar Banquet

NCDD State Delegate

Montana Legal News
UNPUBLISHED OPINION: State v. Matheson
UNPUBLISHED OPINION: City of Missoula v. Walker
OPINION: Matter of K.B. and T.B.
OPINION: Molnar v. Fox
OPINION: State v. Stops
OPINION: State v. Beach
OPINION: Marriage of Pfeifer
UNPUBLISHED OPINION: Klinker v. Schwanke
UNPUBLISHED OPINION: Sampson v. Sampson
UNPUBLISHED OPINION: City of Helena v. Magraw
OPINION: Newman v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., et al.
OPINION: Marriage of Steab
OPINION: Matter of E.Z.C. and E.B.C.
OPINION: Wittich Law Firm v. O’Connell
OPININON: Wheaton v. Bradford